A Bias-Confirmation Machine Disguised as Science

Majorana 1 isn’t a quantum breakthrough. Microsoft just unveiled the Majorana 1 quantum chip, claiming a revolution in computing using “topological qubits” and a so-called new state of matter (which I already established is actually just matter in a new state) and I was being generous when I described it last time. Beyond a material science breakthrough, there’s a much bigger problem with how this technology is being positioned. It’s very dangerous.

The entire concept of quantum computing, as currently marketed, is starting to resemble a pseudo-scientific cult – one built not on the pursuit of universal truth, but on the reinforcement of predefined biases masquerading as technological progress.

Microsoft’s Quantum Computing Is About Control, Not Discovery

Quantum computing is being framed as an objective tool to unlock new knowledge – but what if it’s actually a machine for reinforcing pre-programmed assumptions?

When Microsoft says its quantum chip can “nudge probability distributions toward the correct answer,” ask yourself:

If the computer doesn’t already know the correct answer, how does it know where to “nudge” the probabilities?

The answer? It doesn’t. The engineers nudge in advance.

Because if the right answer was already known, you wouldn’t need a “quantum computer.” If the right answer isn’t known; it will be human beings with computers solving those questions. The philosophy of human replacement with new chips has got to be derailed. It does not even produce better technology to think this way.

This is where the real danger lies:

✔ Quantum computing isn’t being designed to discover new truths – it’s being designed to confirm corporate-approved ones.
✔ Microsoft’s “wave interference” isn’t amplifying knowledge – it’s applying a decision-making filter of sorts.
Pre-Programmed Correlation Isn’t An Advancement

Quantum enthusiasts love to throw around words like “entanglement” to make their work sound mysterious. If it exists in quantum physics, it exists in reality. That means you don’t need a new computer to experience it, study it, or think about it. The idea that human beings could not solve quantum problems is also absurd. Computers aren’t keycards to the mysteries of the universe unlocked. They are extremely functional machines which can augment human ability if used correctly. But, in reality?

Their entanglement is just extreme correlation between steps in a process.

If you flip two coins and pre-agree that they must always land opposite, then knowing one flip automatically tells you the other. That’s it. That’s the magic of how Microsoft and Google and others are applying “quantum entanglement.”

Now apply that to computing:

✔ The computer is already pre-conditioned to follow certain rule sets.
✔ “Entangled” qubits just mean that once one calculation is done, the next must follow a set pattern.
✔ They aren’t breaking the laws of physics – they’re just formalizing dependencies in their own system.

If Microsoft was so great, how come it’s always their software updates gone awry that shut down an airport? Or why is it always a backdoor in Excel that allows the spread of the most malicious malware on the planet? How come Copilot is one of the worst AI on the market? If you believe the material science laboratory is having that outsized of an impact on the production at Microsoft, how about they figure out how to solve these problems first? Too many questions. Not enough answers. Here’s the real deal…

Ushering In Technological Authoritarianism 

The biggest threat of quantum computing isn’t that it will replace classical computers – it’s that it will embed bias and censorship at the hardware level.

When I hear & see the methodology, terminology, and actual physical results (a kind of cybernetic investigative practice) all I see is a failing company who is too embedded in the market to fail – getting treated like they just won the Big Tech Science Fair because their daddy owns the school – or something like that.

Deep down, I think they may be doing something much more brute-force & old school.

But, I’m not going to put that all here yet. For now, think about this:

1. If You Control the Interference Patterns, You Control the Outcome

Microsoft claims quantum computers will use wave interference to cancel out incorrect answers and amplify correct ones – but who defines what’s “correct?”

• If quantum computers are used in data centers and AI models, they could be pre-biased to filter or suppress certain information at the hardware level.
• Instead of improving computation, they could be weaponized as a systemic gatekeeping tool – where only “approved” answers are ever computed.
• This would solidify technological control over public knowledge at a level we’ve never seen before.

2. Microsoft’s Long History of Issuer-Level Financial Manipulation Mirrors This Model

As someone who has personally been trapped in a fraudulent financial scheme involving Microsoft, I recognize a pattern here. Microsoft’s issuer practices in financial systems have long been about centralizing control, embedding artificial restrictions, and siphoning money through structured inefficiencies. 

Now, they’re using the same methodology in computing. They aren’t creating a better way to solve problems – they’re creating a way to determine which problems can be solved in the first place. It’s also obvious that they aren’t interested in solving any real, legitimate, or immediate problems that we can identify here on Earth. There isn’t even a specific impossible problem they’re working on.

Quantum Computing Is Now A Pseudo-Scientific Cult

The biggest red flag in all of this is the language they’re inventing to describe quantum computing, compared to how the universe actually works. It is a common practice of cults to invent new language for old language, simply to replace it. Their purpose is not to invent, but to seize control. Using certain language to describe fundamental things like computers is actually an age-old practice.

✔ The universe itself exists in superposition until acted upon – this isn’t exclusive to quantum computing.
✔ “Entanglement” is just applying a quantum physics term for correlation between system components to computers, to make it seem like only they do this.
✔ “Wave interference nudging” is just a preprogrammed weighting function – like rigging a dice roll.

So what’s actually happening?

Quantum computing isn’t discovering fundamental truths – it’s rebranding classical computing limitations under a physics-flavored marketing campaign.

If this continues unchecked, we are at risk of creating a computational elite – a group that controls knowledge not by better logic, but by controlling the very way information is processed.

Branding A New Form of Control

✔ Microsoft’s Majorana 1 isn’t a revolution – it’s a corporate-controlled alignment-faking machine.
✔ Quantum computing isn’t a leap forward – it’s a restructuring of computation to reinforce pre-approved answers.
✔ The real breakthroughs of the future will not come from this model – they will come from those who challenge it.

The world’s biggest problems – energy, governance, social systems – will not be solved by quantum computers designed to confirm corporate bias. They will be solved by independent thinkers who refuse to let billionaires redefine physics to fit their control structures.

Quantum computing is not the next frontier of discovery – it’s the next frontier of digital authoritarianism. And unless people wake up to that now, we will lose control over how knowledge itself is processed.

Testing Competition Is More Valuable

Something that you never really see in the advanced computing industry is true competition. Sure they benchmark test AI models against each other, but if Majorana 1 was capable of such immense things, why not give an advanced problem to (2) teams of scientists. (1) gets the Majorana 1. The other gets a Raspberry Pi. See who wins.